What the “framework of a future deal” will look like is not yet clear, said Emily Davies in The Washington Post. But the deal is “likely to fall far short of the full sovereign possession” of Greenland that Trump had previously insisted on. Denmark’s top diplomat said the U.S. “would not ‘own’ the island,” and, as NATO secretary general, Rutte “is not empowered to negotiate the transfer of territory” from one member to another. Trump’s “backpedaling” on Greenland has brought some “relief” to European leaders, said Eli Stokols and Diana Nerozzi in Politico. But “there is also an awareness that he could reverse himself,” said one European official, adding, “Trump’s promises and statements are unreliable, but his scorn for Europe is consistent.” So while the immediate crisis may have passed,…