Evidence
However, Jonker said Nashwa’s version was contradicted by the complainant, her mother, and the medical evidence.
The high court said there was no basis to interfere with the regional magistrate’s judgment on conviction.
During the trial, the court heard that the complainant knew Nashwa, who resided across from her and her mother at their hostel.
They would occasionally converse about topics such as school and cooking, and she regarded him as an older brother.
On the day of the incident, it was the complainant’s version that she had attended a party and returned home by 9pm. She went to bed but later awoke feeling nauseous at approximately 11pm.
After using the bathroom, she encountered Nashwa, who asked her to assist him with the light in his room. The girl…