Most people think President Trump 2.0 will be a disaster for the climate.
There is much evidence to justify this sentiment. Case in point: his pick for energy secretary, oil wildcatter Chris Wright, said last year, “There is no climate crisis, and we’re not in the midst of an energy transition, either.” But what if a different outcome is possible?
To explore this question in a clear-eyed way, two things matter: how much can a president tip the scale on climate solutions, and in which direction will it tip?
Let’s follow the money: the United States accounts for 15% of global investments in climate solutions, so 85% of the action is elsewhere (mostly China).
Also, don’t forget that while the executive branch of the U.S. government can be a powerful…